HAMAS is a PROXY-ISRAELI MILITIA, created, used and armed by ISRAEL....
The GAZA operation is a dry run for an imminent attack on Lebanon.
A Hamas imam, who recruits for Hamas in the West Bank, was reported to have told Die Presse Vienna, that elements of the Israeli army provided his group with weapons. The comments of Imam "Ali" were made during an undated interview with Die Presse and the interview was reported on December 3o, 2008.
When asked where Hamas gets its weapons, "Ali" replied, "Smuggling, for example from Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood supports Hamas. But the Mafia in the Israeli Army also sold us weapons during the Intifada. Israel does that to this day. It often happens that Israeli soldiers lie that they have lost their weapons. In reality they sell them to Hamas. And Hamas takes them because it must have weapons, it makes no difference who they come from. Hamas is poorly armed. The explosives are handmade, just like the Qassam rockets."
When asked why Israelis would want to pass weapons to Hamas, Ali responded, "Israel's interest is that Hamas be well-armed so that the world sees that Hamas is militarily fully equipped. Two things can be said on that: First of all, Hamas knows about it. Second, Hamas has a weak army. The strength of Hamas is the loyalty of its members. They would not cheat the army. But Israel makes the press, the propaganda. For everything that happens Israel has a scapegoat: Hamas. Israel tends toward exaggeration only to show that Hamas is a terror movement."
It is well known that Hamas was created by Mossad to act as a foil against Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement. Apparently, the links between Israel and Hamas continue to this day.
The reason the rationale for invading Gaza keeps changing, (from rocket-fire to Hamas infrastructure to strengthening deterrents to weapons smuggling to ceasefire violations etc) is because the Israeli leadership wants to conceal the true objective. The purpose of "Operation Cast Lead" is to conduct a dress rehearsal for another invasion of Lebanon.
That's the real goal. Israel has never recovered from its defeat at the hands of Hezbollah during the 33 Day war in 2006, so it is planning to restart hostilities. The attack on Gaza is just a "dry run" to strengthen morale and put the finishing touches on the battle plan. That's why there's such a disparity between the implicit risks of the current operation and its minuscule strategic gains. It's not really Hamas in the cross-hairs, but Hezbollah; and this time, Israel hopes to crush them with overwhelming force. The massive week-long aerial bombardment of Gaza; the pounding by heavy artillery units, and the deployment of elite troops and armored divisions, all presage a massive Normandy-type invasion of Lebanon with the probability of high casualties.
Gaza has also been the testing ground for new Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Chief of the General Staff Gabi Ashkenazi. Barak and Ashkenazi replaced former Defense chief Amir Peretz and Israeli Air Force Commander Dan Halutz, the two main scapegoats for the failed campaign. The new leaders are expected to take what they've learned in Gaza and use it in Lebanon. So far, the invasion appears to have gone according to plan.
Israel's Tonkin Bay?
Two days before Israel began its bombardment of the Gaza Strip, UNIFIL (UN peacekeepers) increased the number of daily patrols along Lebanon's southern border. According to the Jerusalem Post, "The decision to increase UNIFIL's patrols had nothing to do with Israel's military operation... but rather with the international organization's goal to monitor the implementation of Security Council Resolution 1701."
Hezbollah has been watching the activity on the border with growing concern suspecting that Israel may be using the invasion of Gaza to divert attention from their real objective, another war in Lebanon. Presently, the Shi'ite militia is on its highest alert and is preparing itself for any sudden flare up. Israeli warplanes have increased their flights over Lebanon in the last 10 days and the IDF has called up thousands of reserve troops and placed some of them along the northern border. Naturally, the tension is rising . Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah has publicly rejected the idea of supporting Hamas militarily, but the Israeli media continues to portray him as a potential threat.
"We are here, ready for every possibility and prepared for any aggression," Nasrallah said on Monday. "We will not weaken, fear or surrender. I tell Olmert, the loser, the disappointed and defeated in Lebanon, 'You will not be able to eradicate Hamas and you will not be able to eradicate Hezbollah."
THE SMOKING GUN?
"On Monday, Lebanese president Michel Suleiman suggested Israel was responsible for eight rockets that were found in southern Lebanon, saying that he fears "it is an Israeli attack to implicate Lebanon."
The eight rockets were on timers and aimed at Israel from Lebanese territory. Was Israel planning to start a war and make it look Hezbollah was to blame? once Israel is finished with Gaza, it would attack Lebanon in reprisal for its failure in the 33-day war.
“I'm sure that Israel's thinking after Gaza would turn towards Lebanon, and after Lebanon it will take every Arab state one by one, and this is what some of the Lebanese as some Arab leaders are not thinking about,” ....This is while Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was quoted as telling the French president Nicolas Sarkozy on Monday that "today Hamas and Tomorrow Hezbollah," will come under attack....
Provocative comments by Head of Military Intelligence Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin: "Yadlin said, 'Hezbollah might carry out a low-profile attack by means of a Palestinian organization that would be limited and not set the border alight.' He added that forces also remained on high alert in light of a possible Hezbollah strike against an Israeli target abroad....in revenge for Imad F. Mughnieh's assassination in Damascus by the White House Murder Machinations Inc, and its chief architect in the Levant Asef Shawkat, a proficient ASSASSIN."
Who really wants another war; Hezbollah or Israel?
Israel never accepted the outcome of the 33 Day war and will probably use the UN's failure to implement UN Resolution 1701--which requires the disarming of all militias--as an excuse for restarting the conflict. "Yes, 1701 stopped the war in 2006. It stopped the fighting. I mean it saved the Israelis, the Israelis were obviously in deep trouble as various internal investigations and reports and commissions have elaborated....It was kind of an unfinished war in many respects. Hezbollah, for their part, recognized Israeli unease and unhappiness with the outcome of the war."
Israel considers the war "unfinished" and has been readying itself for two and a half years for a rematch this spring....
"Greater Israel"
The upcoming war with Lebanon has less to do with Hezbollah than it does with Israel's geopolitical ambitions. Israel wants to establish a new northern border at the Litani River in southern Lebanon and create an "Israel-friendly" regime in Beirut. The plan to annex the land south of the Litani River dates back to the founding of the Jewish state when Israel’s first Prime Minister David Ben Gurion described the country’s future borders this way: "To the north the Litani River, the southern border will be pushed into the Sinai, and to the east, the Syrian Desert, including the furthest edge of Transjordan."
In 1978, the IDF launched Operation Litani with the intention of annexing the southern part of Lebanon and setting up a Christian client-regime in Beirut that would take orders from Tel Aviv. Israel said that it needed a "buffer zone" for its security, the same excuse that it uses today. The 1982 invasion devolved into an 18-year onslaught which ravaged the Lebanese economy and killed more than 25,000 civilians. In 2000, Israel was driven from Lebanon by the region's newest guerrilla resistance fighters, Hezbollah.
Israel's territorial objectives have not changed. They want to seize more land to achieve their vision of "Greater Israel" and reduce adjacent Arab countries to a "permanent state of colonial dependency".
This explains why Lebanon’s civilian infrastructure and communications network were intentionally targeted. Israel requires its neighbors to languish in abject poverty and hopelessness. By destroying Lebanon's life-support systems, Israel figured it would eliminate a potential rival while establishing itself as the dominant power in the Middle East. This same template for "total war" is being used in Gaza where mosques, schools, media offices, sea ports, girl's dormitories, ambulances and vital infrastructure have been destroyed while international media, doctors and the Red Crescent have been refused entry. The rules of war have been abandoned altogether.
BLUEPRINT FOR REBUILDING ZIONISM...
"A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" provides the neocon blueprint for "rebuilding Zionism in the 21st century" and redrawing the map of the Middle East in a way that promotes Israeli interests. The document states:
"Securing the Northern Border: Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which America can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran, as the principle agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by: paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syria is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove to be insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper." (A Clean Break; Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser)
Eventually, Syria will be dragged into the war so that Israel can move forward with its plans to build a oil pipeline from Mosul to Haifa. Israel wants to be a major player in the global oil trade. In Michel Chossudovsky’s article "Triple Alliance: US, Turkey, Israel and the War on Lebanon", the author says:
"We are not dealing with a limited conflict between the Israeli Armed Forces and Hezbollah as conveyed by the Western media. The Lebanese War Theatre is part of a broader US military agenda, which encompasses a region extending from the Eastern Mediterranean into the heartland of Central Asia. The war on Lebanon must be viewed as ‘a stage’ in this broader ‘military road map’".
Chossudovsky shows how the recently completed Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline has strengthened the Israel-Turkey alliance creating an opportunity to establish "military control over a coastal corridor extending from the Israeli-Lebanese border to the East Mediterranean border between Syria and Turkey." Lebanese sovereignty is likely to be one of the casualties of this Israel-Turkey strategy.
Most of the oil from the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline will be transported to Western markets, but a percentage of the oil will be diverted through a "proposed" Ceyhan-Ashkelon pipeline which will connect Israel directly to rich deposits in the Caspian. This will allow Israel to supply markets in the Far East from its port at Eilat on the Red Sea. It is an ambitious plan that ensures that Israel will be a critical part of the global energy distribution system. (See Michel Chossudovsky, The War on Lebanon and the Battle for Oil, July 2006)
Oil is the main reason the US and Israel want regime change in Syria. An article in the UK Observer, "Israel Seeks Pipeline for Iraqi Oil", notes that Washington and Tel Aviv are hammering out the details for a pipeline that will run through Syria and "create an endless and easily accessible source of cheap oil for the US guaranteed by reliable allies other than Saudi Arabia." The pipeline "would transform economic power in the region, bringing revenue to the new US-dominated Iraq, cutting out Syria, and solving Israel’s energy crisis at a stroke."
The Israeli Mossad is operating in northern Iraq where the pipeline will originate and their agents have developed good relations with the Kurds. The Observer quotes a CIA official who said, "It has long been a dream of a powerful section of the people now driving this administration and the war in Iraq to safeguard Israel’s energy supply as well as that of the US. The Haifa pipeline was something that existed, was resurrected as a dream, and is now a viable project — albeit with a lot of building to do."
NATURAL GAS OFF THE COAST OF GAZA ....
Ironically, the invasion of Gaza was in part motivated by vital energy resources, too. According to an article by Jake Bower, "Why It Rains: Hamas holding Israeli gas reserves hostage":
"GAZA: Plans for proposed $400,000,000 offshore natural gas field development project....The deposit reportedly contains an estimated 50 to 60 billion cubic meters of natural gas. The field... is considered to be the largest in the area north of Egypt....
Estimated at 100 billion cubic meters of proven reserves, these discoveries potentially offer enough gas to meet Israel's goal of supplying 25% of its energy needs for more than 20 years - even without further imports. The discovery has also raised realistic expectations of locating oil deposits beneath the gas fields.
Unfortunately for Israel, 60% of these reserves are in waters controlled by the Palestinian Authority, which has signed a 25-year contract with British Gas for further exploration in the area.... Keen to secure the gas for its domestic market but unwilling to submit its sensitive energy supplies (and their profits) into the hands of the Palestinians, Israel has for the past 6 years pursued a policy of non-commitment, stalling and obstruction." ("Why It Rains: Hamas holding Israeli gas reserves hostage...") http://tinyurl.com/7y2bcf
The natural gas deposits are just one more reason why Israel plans to remove Hamas and replace it with Mahmoud Abbas and the corrupt Palestinian Authority (PA).
The Middle East is being reshaped according to the ideological aspirations of Zionists and the exigencies of a viciously-competitive energy market. That's a combo that makes peace nearly impossible.....
------------------------------------------------------------
Hamas is MOSSAD.... " Demography is KEY "
"Give them enough rope, they will hang themselves".
What is Israel's objective in its current invasion of Gaza?
Clearly the message has been to protect its Citizens from the Hamas
rockets, but could there be another, underlying tactic?
Divide and conquer is an old tried and tested technique in dealing
with opponents....
Hamas is a Creation of Mossad
The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/ZER403A.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks to the Mossad, Israel's "Institute for Intelligence and Special Tasks", the Hamas was allowed to reinforce its presence in the occupied territories. Meanwhile, Arafat's Fatah Movement for National Liberation as well as the Palestinian Left were subjected to the most brutal form of repression and intimidation
Let us not forget that it was Israel, which in fact created Hamas. According to Zeev Sternell, historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, "Israel thought that it was a smart ploy to push the Islamists against the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO)".
Ahmed Yassin, the spiritual leader of the Islamist movement in Palestine, returning from Cairo in the seventies, established an Islamic charity association. Prime Minister Golda Meir, saw this as a an opportunity to counterbalance the rise of Arafat’s Fatah movement. .According to the Israeli weekly Koteret Rashit (October 1987), "The Islamic associations as well as the university had been supported and encouraged by the Israeli military authority" in charge of the (civilian) administration of the West Bank and Gaza. "They [the Islamic associations and the university] were authorized to receive money payments from abroad."
The Islamists set up orphanages and health clinics, as well as a network of schools, workshops which created employment for women as well as system of financial aid to the poor. And in 1978, they created an "Islamic University" in Gaza. "The military authority was convinced that these activities would weaken both the PLO and the leftist organizations in Gaza." At the end of 1992, there were six hundred mosques in Gaza. Thanks to Israel’s intelligence agency Mossad (Israel’s Institute for Intelligence and Special Tasks) , the Islamists were allowed to reinforce their presence in the occupied territories. Meanwhile, the members of Fatah (Movement for the National Liberation of Palestine) and the Palestinian Left were subjected to the most brutal form of repression.
In 1984, Ahmed Yassin was arrested and condemned to twelve years in prison, after the discovery of a hidden arms cache. But one year later, he was set free and resumed his activities. And when the Intifada (‘uprising’) began, in October 1987, which took the Islamists by surprise, Sheik Yassin responded by creating the Hamas (The Islamic Resistance Movement): "God is our beginning, the prophet our model, the Koran our constitution", proclaims article 7 of the charter of the organization.
Ahmed Yassin was in prison when, the Oslo accords (Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government) were signed in September 1993. The Hamas had rejected Oslo outright. But at that time, 70% of Palestinians had condemned the attacks on Israeli civilians. Yassin did everything in his power to undermine the Oslo accords. Even prior to Prime Minister Rabin’s death, he had the support of the Israeli government. The latter was very reluctant to implement the peace agreement.
The Hamas then launched a carefully timed campaign of attacks against civilians, one day before the meeting between Palestinian and Israeli negotiators, regarding the formal recognition of Israel by the National Palestinian Council. These events were largely instrumental in the formation of a Right wing Israeli government following the May 1996 elections.
Quite unexpectedly, Prime Minister Netanyahu ordered Sheik Ahmed Yassin to be released from prison ("on humanitarian grounds") where he was serving a life sentence. Meanwhile, Netanyahu, together with President Bill Clinton, was putting pressure on Arafat to control the Hamas. In fact, Netanyahu knew that he could rely, once more, on the Islamists to sabotage the Oslo accords. Worse still: after having expelled Yassin to Jordan, Prime Minister Netanyahu allowed him to return to Gaza, where he was welcomed triumphantly as a hero in October 1997.
Arafat was helpless in the face of these events. Moreover, because he had supported Saddam Hussein during the 1991 Gulf war, (while the Hamas had cautiously abstained from taking sides), the Gulf states decided to cut off their financing of the Palestinian Authority. Meanwhile, between February and April 1998, Sheik Ahmad Yassin was able to raise several hundred million dollars, from those same countries. The budget of The Hamas was said to be greater than that of the Palestinian Authority. These new sources of funding enabled the Islamists to effectively pursue their various charitable activities. It is estimated that one Palestinian out of three is the recipient of financial aid from the Hamas. And in this regard, Israel has done nothing to curb the inflow of money into the occupied territories.
The Hamas had built its strength through its various acts of sabotage of the peace process, in a way which was compatible with the interests of the Israeli government. In turn, the latter sought in a number of ways, to prevent the application of the Oslo accords. In other words, Hamas was fulfilling the functions for which it was originally created: to prevent the creation of a Palestinian State. And in this regard, Hamas and Ariel Sharon, see eye to eye; they are exactly on the same wave length...always.
According to Prof. Zeev Sternell, historian at the Hebrew University
of Jerusalem, "Israel thought that it was a smart ploy to push the
Islamists against the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO)". (A
Google search on {Hamas mossad} turns up over a half million results,
from many diverse and reputable sources which support the assertion
that Israel played a key role in creating Hamas.)
In this, it has proved very successful. Arafat's Fatah Movement for
National Liberation as well as the Palestinian Left were subjected to
the most brutal form of repression and intimidation. Eventually the
Palestinian people cried 'enough' ....and voted in Hamas/MOSSAD...
Israel needs the cover of rockets and terrorism to distract from its
41-year mission to expand its borders to include East Jerusalem and
40% of the West Bank. Israel is the only Middle East entity to not
favor the Arab Peace Plan (which calls for security and recognition
of Israel _within its legal pre-1967 boundaries_ (Hamas favors this).
It's about the occupation....all the time, and pretending to "secure" a
non-existent Israeli borders.... stupid! It's not rocket science!
Fatah - is Next ...- and so it goes...until all Palestinians are
pushed into Jordan and the GUCCI... GCC countries for good....
--
The Washington Post has finally acknowledged—albeit buried in an
“analysis” on its back pages—the explosive and little-known point first
made by American Free Press as long ago as Oct. 29, 2001 (and later on
July 8, 2002 and Feb. 13, 2006): that Israel had a secret agenda
vis-a-vis Islamic fundamentalist groups such as Hamas, that Israel had a
long, well-documented history of propping up Islamic fundamentalism
(including terrorist organizations) for its own purposes.
Writing in the Post on January 7, 2009, the newspaper’s foreign
correspondent Glenn Kessler revealed:
In the 1980s . . . the Israeli government decided to weaken the secular
Fatah movement headed by Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO]
Chairman Yasser Arafat by promoting the rise of Islamic parties as a
counterweight, on the theory that Islamic groups would not have the same
nationalistic impulses. So Fatah’s social networks were dismantled by
the Israeli government, but it went easy on Islamic charitable networks.
This decision fueled the rise of Hamas as a political force, with its
network of health clinics and social services that far exceeded the
abilities of the often-corrupt Fatah movement. . . .
Israel now wants to make a peace deal with Mahmoud Abbas, the
Palestinian authority president who heads Fatah but has no control over
Gaza. So one of the Israeli aims in Gaza today is to weaken Hamas enough
that it can no longer be a political rival to Fatah in Gaza—the opposite
of what Israel hoped to achieve decades ago with its efforts to
encourage the rise of Islamic groups.
In short, behind-the-scenes schemers in Israel saw Hamas in its earliest
days as a counter-balance against any Palestinian moves for peace. In
other words, as long as Hamas had enough influence, it might prevent the
peace process with the “moderate” forces of secular Palestinian
statesman Yasser Arafat (leader of Fatah) from going forward.
While many good people do not understand why Israel would not want
peace, Israel’s intrigues serve at least three purposes: 1) preserving
internal conflict within the Palestinian movement; 2) giving Israel the
opportunity to claim that the peace process could not go forward because
“Arafat and the PLO control the extremist elements” and 3) perpetuating
overall Middle East conflict, which has always been Israel’s motivation,
preferring to see its Arab neighbors divided—quarreling with one
another—thereby unable to check Israel’s regional desires.
All of this is not to suggest that Hamas is somehow a secret “tool” of
Israel—as some naive folks have suggested. Far from it. In fact, Hamas
clearly captured the support of many Palestinians (Muslim and Christian
alike) who do not necessarily share Hamas’ Islamic focus. And after
Hamas won a democratic election in taking control of the Palestinian
Authority in 2002, Israel saw the proverbial “blowback.”
On June 28, 2002, veteran UPI correspondent Richard Sale confirmed what
AFP had already reported regarding Israel’s manipulation of Islamic
fundamentalist forces.
Sale focused on Israel’s intrigues regarding Hamas. Sale cited not only
a variety of named and un-named past and present U.S. government
officials but also documents obtained by UPI from the Israel-based
Institute for Counter-Terrorism.
Noting that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was vowing to fight
“Palestinian terror” and declaring Hamas as “the deadliest terrorist
group that we have ever had to face,” Sale noted wryly that “Sharon left
something out.”
That “something,” according to Sale, was that while Israel and Hamas
were then currently locked in deadly combat, “according to several
current and former U.S. intelligence officials, beginning in the late
1970s, Tel Aviv gave direct and indirect financial aid to Hamas over a
period of years.”
So the fact is that Israel’s activities laid the groundwork for the
crisis that now rages in Gaza. Sale pointed out that Hamas was actually
legally registered as an Islamic social and religious entity in Israel
in 1978 and that U.S. administration officials said that funding for
Hamas came from not just the oil-producing Arab states but “directly and
indirectly from Israel.”
While the PLO itself was secular, promoting Palestinian nationalism,
Hamas was intent upon setting up a transnational state ruled by the
tenets of Islam. Sale also cited an unnamed former senior CIA official
saying that Israel’s support for Hamas “was a direct attempt to divide
and dilute support for a strong, secular PLO by using a competing
religious alternative.”
Sale cited Tony Cordesman, a respected veteran Mideast analyst
associated with the Center for Strategic Studies, who said that Israel
“aided Hamas directly—the Israelis wanted to use it as a counterbalance
to the PLO.”
Then, when the PLO moved its base of operations to Beirut, Hamas began
growing in influence in the Israeli occupied West Bank.
All of these elements converged at exactly the time when Israel was
funding Hamas. However, even the growing strength and independence of
Hamas did not deter the Israelis from supporting them.
A U.S. government official—who asked not to be named—told Sale that “The
thinking on the part of some of the right-wing Israeli establishment was
that Hamas and the others, if they gained control, would refuse to have
any part of the peace process and would torpedo any agreements put in
place. Israel would still be the only democracy in the region for the
U.S. to deal with.”
In other words, Israel wanted to prop up and promote Hamas as a means of
undermining the influence of Yasser Arafat and the PLO and thereby
disrupting the very real peace initiatives being made by Arafat.
Israel wanted an unending state of war in order to be able to continue
to justify its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza
and—inevitably—expand Israel’s borders into what is known as “Greater
Israel.”
Thus, the Israelis sponsored—as they soon discovered—a movement that
quickly grew out of control. Although the Israelis sought to manipulate
Hamas from within—penetrating it with Israeli spies—independent-minded
Hamas leaders weeded out Israeli collaborators. Hamas thus became a
self-sustaining, popularly backed movement that emerged as a very real
threat to Israel, to the extent that any such movement could be a threat
to the well-armed and U.S.-backed Zionist state.
Sale pointed out that Israel’s posturing and manipulation “disgusts”
U.S. analysts who have watched Israel’s initial nurturing of the very
groups that Israel now demands that the United States and the world wage
war against on Israel’s behalf.
Now Israel is crying that “we are under siege and fighting back to
protect our people,” the fact is that it is the Palestinian Christians
and Muslims who are under siege. The truth is that three times as many
Palestinians as Israelis have died during the past ten years.
And while many Americans somehow have been convinced that Hamas are
with Israel,” some of Israel’s leading publicists on American soil are
not so subtly saying that even Fatah is a possible danger to Israel....?
For example, “neo-conservative” propagandist Clifford May, writing in
the Washington Times on Jan. 11, asserted that even though Fatah may be
hoping—even helping—Israel in its campaign against Hamas, “it doesn’t
mean Fatah will henceforth [have] good will and a spirit of compromise
toward Israel.”
In other words: Israel will deal with Fatah after it is done wiping
Hamas off the map....then it will turn around and find the "right" ways to
Well, the US backed the Mujahidin against the Soviets, including Bin
Laden, and so one could also know that the US built up Al Qaeda. It
is true that back in the late 1970s, that in the face of PLO terror
that Israel started to back more conservative, anticommunist
"religious" elements" which ended up backfiring because of a
fundamental misunderstanding of CIA2/MOSSAD itself. Fundamentally,
This former PLO thuggish murderer, Walid Shoebat, who saw the light,
analyzed the vicious murderous nature of the movement he was raised
into, is now a lover of MOSSAD and I would make him the head of Israeli
hasbara if I were the PM of NaziIsrael....
